this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
748 points (98.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

11540 readers
1654 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 212 points 1 month ago
[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 171 points 1 month ago (6 children)

There's no objective reason that this is wrong, but still, take that shit far far away from me

[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 129 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Doesn't it fuck up the binding? Sure, a softback is still going to stay together in the immediate term, but the covers are almost always a single stronger piece, whereas the pages will now be free to work loose from the cut side.

So... I'd say it is objectively worse.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Naich@piefed.world 113 points 1 month ago

That psychopath needs reporting to the police.

[–] Overspark@piefed.social 89 points 1 month ago (5 children)

That's just wrong. If you're worried about portability get an e-reader, don't butcher up works of art.

[–] Orygin@sh.itjust.works 112 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I think most e-readers will stop working if you cut them in half to be more portable. Books still have the upper hand on this

[–] valkyre09@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Plus you can start a fire with them when you’re done, try to start a fire with an e-reader you gonna get one hell of a surprise

[–] lauha@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Pretty sure all ereaders work with lithium ion batteries these days. They're quite flammable.

Even better, try making fire with a wet book. My ereadwr catches on fire when it gets wet though! Suck it dead trees

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 35 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I mean, if you had like a hand bound copy or rare out of print book or something like that this sentiment makes sense, but if it's just some abundant mass produced edition, I'm not so sure. Surely the artistry there is in the words, which aren't damaged and exist in other copies anyway, rather than the cheap machine made physical medium.

[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 14 points 1 month ago

It would absolutely ruin their durability, so I'd say it's definitely objectively a bad idea.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No works of art were hurt for this. Mass printed paperback spines being damaged doesn’t hurt the words inside or the hundreds of thousands of other copies. Everyone should feel free to write on, highlight, and cut apart mass printed books, because the actual object itself was never the point.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BaraCoded@literature.cafe 57 points 1 month ago (34 children)

Author here, I don't give a fuck, as long as the book was bought/is read. Stop fetishizing books or start fucking them. 

I do wonder why this person wouldn't just use a e-ink reader, though.

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

I feel like there is a lack of understanding how or what about e-ink. My partner only grasped the concept that it's not an emmisive display after the 5th time explaining. And some friends still don't seem to understand the difference between an e-reader and tablet. (they are extremely tech-illiterate)

If I extrapolate this, there have to be a lot of people who don't want an e-reader because 'they don't want to look at a screen'.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (33 replies)
[–] WandowsVista@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

this is so wrong.

you're supposed to cut them in half so you can fit each side in the pockets of your cargo shorts.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 13 points 1 month ago (7 children)

That's why I cut mine in half through the middle of the cover; top and bottom halves. Sure, makes it a little harder to read, but worth it when I can fit each half in my pockets perfectly.

[–] WandowsVista@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

if you cut them long ways, you can hide them up your sleeve like a hotdog

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] pianoplant@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Clearly this is someone who actually reads their books. Given that they are mass market paperbacks... I have no problem with this. If I were an author I would much rather someone does this to my work and actually reads it and enjoys it to someone keeping a pristine copy unopened on their shelf forever.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago (9 children)

infinite jest is half footnotes, which are at the back of the book, which is part of the "joke" of the book, being based around extreme academia.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago

In all honesty, in no way sarcastically, I consider this a war crime.

[–] username_1@programming.dev 33 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Deport him to... away. Far far away.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Skip jail. Straight to a firing squad of librarians.

[–] TomArrr@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Easy to spot, they're the only firing squad with silencers

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Dry_Monk@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

"yeah, I just finished Infinite. It was pretty good, abrupt ending though. I hear Jest picks up right where it left off."

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 23 points 1 month ago

You should cut diagonally. If it makes a sandwich better, imagine what it can do for a novel.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 month ago
[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

I have never been so offended by something so harmless in the greater scheme of things.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (10 children)

last year I've allowed myself to do marginalia, to allow me to write notes and whatever I want on the books I read while I read. it's inherently destructive, but it changes the whole experience. reading is no longer a passive activity but a conversation with the material. and I love it.

but felt guilty about doing irreversible changes to the book. then this shit shows up.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's destructive but it's also constructive. That conversation with the material gives future owners new perspectives. At least in my opinion as someone who collects old subcultural texts. Notes in the margins adds to the experience of an old book

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's a mass-produced book, and a paperback at that. You can certainly keep any such book in good condition to archive or re-read on your own terms. But that stack of acid-paper and cheap glue is going to eventually self-destruct. Unless it's a limited production run, in danger of getting burned, autographed, is an actual collectable, or something else that makes it distinct or valuable, I say: go for it.

Source: I own a stack of these from back in the day. Despite my best efforts to store them appropriately, they're all slowly rotting away. Some things just aren't meant to last.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When you get right down to it, that's true for everything. Everything self-destructs eventually. So, that seems like a strange reason to destroy it prematurely.

Of course, if it's your book, you can do whatever you want with it. It just seems needlessly wasteful.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shyguyblue@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Unless it's Warren Peace, no one should be doing this!?

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Warren peace

Guessing you're dictating this to your less-cultured secretary?

[–] West_of_West@piefed.social 10 points 1 month ago

No it's a humorous adaption on the classic, that takes place in the woods and the characters are anthromorphised rabbits.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Emma_Gold_Man@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 month ago

As someone who would never, ever do this to one of my beloved collection: Go for it. Watever keeps you enjoying them. As others have said, we're not talking hundred year old first edition hardcovers here. You can still tape them up and pass them on, unlike those philistines who take one on a hike and rip out the pages they've read to use for campfire tinder.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 month ago

Before seeing this i thought i was anti death penalty.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I cut mine cross-wise to save space. There is a lot of authors who make no sense.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 month ago

The reason I only find half of a story when exploring in video games

[–] spitfire@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago
[–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

This doesn't actually save much space, which is why I cut mine in half horizontally across the pages

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 11 points 1 month ago

They're gonna be damaged by simply reading them anyways. If they didn't want the books damaged, they should come in smaller parts.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 month ago

I have a compact paperback copy of The Count of Monte Cristo that this would be helpful but the end pages will just fall off for most bindings so it’s not a good idea.

[–] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I don't know, I'm a priest and I once sliced up a Bible for personal use.

Tthere was once a particular version of the Bible that I wanted, but the publisher only made a hard-backed version. I hate hard-back books (especially Bibles). So I bought it and immediately sliced the cover off and made a new one out of old church bulletins and duct tape.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Ngl this inspires me. I was just looking up pocket versions of books I could stuff in my tool bag. It never occured to me I could just butcher a book.

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I love destroying the books I read. I buy ancient paperbacks used and choose not to care about their well-being, storing them in my pocket until the wheels fall off. When I read Dracula my book had no front or back cover and I kept the last 15 or so pages tucked in loose in the middle of the book because they would fall off every time I cracked it open.

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 8 points 1 month ago (14 children)

I don't get the reverence for copies of mass produced objects. I love music too but i don't care if someone uses a marker to write their name on a vinyl jacket. (As long as it's not a rare copy)

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 month ago

The vast majority of books made in something like the last 50+ years are all very low quality and degrade rapidly anyway.

load more comments
view more: next ›