this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
117 points (98.3% liked)

PC Gaming

12772 readers
1180 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm not comfortable having a unitary absolute monarchy sticking their fingers in my hobby.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 hours ago

It's worth noting that none of these distressed investments are directly related to gaming.

The irony is thick and frothy, a magnificent head.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 27 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I am if it finally kills EA. The irony for them to be bought and then shortly killed as they've done themselves to so many other developers would be too good.

[–] Catpurple@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It would be sad in the same way THQ dying was sad, just for the unknowns of where the IPs, studios and employees end up- but also really funny and very fitting.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 hours ago

where the IPs......end up

Abandonware sites! 😎👉👉

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 62 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

I can see how buying EA could be the harbinger of doom for an unwise purchaser.

[–] bonenode@piefed.social 34 points 12 hours ago

EA, do your thing!

[–] CalPal@lemmy.ca 7 points 8 hours ago

Saudi Arabia: "I am assuming direct control."

EA: "Wait, I know this line..."

SA: "I am the vanguard of your destruction. This corporation is over."

EA: "Fffffuuuuuuuck..."

If ea is the god of shit, and SA is the titan of shit...

[–] elgordino@fedia.io 39 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

No surprise they’re running out of cash with the number of absurd mega projects they’re involved with. The EA purchase is pretty minor compared to those shambles.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 13 points 10 hours ago

I just hope their mega-city bankrupts them to hell and back, twice.

[–] golli@sopuli.xyz 13 points 11 hours ago

I would even go as far and say that the EA purchase (price aside) is one that kind of makes sense compared to some other projects like the line or the absurd sums they are paying to individual athletes.

With all their sports washing and involvement in that area there might be synergies with all the sport game franchises EA has that can be leveraged.

And with them being focused quite a bit on tourism and hosting events having EA also helps on the esports side. Buying the publisher is basically buying the sports federation. Usually they can just bribe those, not straight up buy them outright.

[–] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

OP your username is amazing 👏

[–] alzjim@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Keyboard Superstar

[–] Victoriathecompact@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

I stopped playing sims when it was announced. I started playing Sims 3 15 years ago, and ran a whole Sims 4 simblr for the last 10. Not even mentioning my love affair with Mass Effect and Dragon Age...

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I dropped sims 4 too. If you like to build, I've found recently House Flipper 2 is everything I ever wanted in a building game. Not a life sim, but still pretty cool

oo nice, thanks for the recommendation!

[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 14 points 11 hours ago

...or just liquidate the company's assets outright.

Dooooo it

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Does a fund run by despots even have to worry about financial solvency? They have no problem oppressing more people to continue funding evil as they wish, and our leaders practically cheer and lick their assholes clean while they do it.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Yes, kings who couldn't pay their debts lost the ability to finance the ability to project force. Sure you can discharge your debts, but eventually the money lenders stop lending. Money is a representation of value and must correlate to the price of labor and goods, otherwise the army starts asking why they don't have the ability to buy food. A monarch or two can get away with it by kicking the can down the road, but lenders are in the business of making safe bets.

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 2 points 10 hours ago

Man, I'm just hoping that a sequel to Jedi Survivor comes out at some point. Maybe it'll get sold to another publisher, idk how this shit works.