this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2025
34 points (100.0% liked)

Wild Feed

129 readers
48 users here now

A catch-all world journalism community for news, reports, blogs, editorials, and whatever.

Rules:

  1. Be cool to each other. Instance rules apply.

  2. All posts should link to a current* blog, article, editorial, listicle, research paper, or something that can be considered "news."

  3. Post title should be the article title or best fit.

  4. No misinformation or bigotry.

  5. Provide an archived link in the text body of the post for paywalled media.

Tags: Not required unless the post fits under one of the below categories.

[NSFW] and [Content Warning - x] — At your discretion.

[OLD - (year)] — For old but relevant articles. Use your best judgement.

[Conspiracy Tuesday] — Conspiracy theories/occult themes/cryptids/pseudoscience. On Tuesdays.

[E-mail required] — If an e-mail is needed to sign in.

A more serious community for Independent Journalism — https://lemmy.today/c/Independent_Media

Both communities were created with the goal of increasing media pluralism.

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FunctionallyLiterate@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Also, the Web itself didn't really exist until '93, so those listed before weren't web sites at the time. Maybe they had gopher, telnet, FTP, & email servers, but not web.

[–] Icytrees@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Usenet, too, probably. It got going around 1980. But yeah, not technically web sites.

[–] RobertoOberto@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

The audacity to write a list of 20 interesting websites without including a single clickable link to any of them...

[–] FunctionallyLiterate@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I thought IMDB started life under the .org TLD as a volunteer enthusiast-driven site & didn't go to the .com TLD until somewhere around the time that Amazon bought them. I wasn't paying much attention to them so I'm probably wrong, but that's how I remember it.

[–] emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Pretty sure this is true, its how i remembered it too so i checked the wayback machine and imdb.org was active until at least 2008, then theres nothing archived until 2011 when it shows a redirect to imdb.com so it was somewhere in between there

[–] FunctionallyLiterate@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

Thank you for confirming I haven't completely lost what little memory I ever had. I've suffered from CRS most of my life, so I'm never 100% certain even when I do have a strong memory of something.

[–] Icytrees@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] FunctionallyLiterate@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Thanks, but while I wasn't aware of that, if someone had told me it pre-dated the web then I'd pretty much have guessed something like that was why. The Web just made things much easier & more accessible for non-technical people to use. BBSs, USENET, IRC, etc. were all in heavy use well before that.

[–] Icytrees@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

I agree. I'm just sharing an article I found when I saw your post and decided to look into it, because I thought it was interesting.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

While the Mac on the left would be able to connect to and render websites from that era, I have my doubts that the IBM XT pictured would be able to do so. Gopher, maybe.

[–] FunctionallyLiterate@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There were DOS web browsers - I distinctly recall Arachne, for example.

[–] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 month ago

MicroWeb is pretty impressive when I tried it on an 8MHz 186-class CPU. Arachne needs a bit more horsepower to be usable.