this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
743 points (99.1% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

41057 readers
1581 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] captainastronaut@seattlelunarsociety.org 24 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

A good attorney could argue that drilling a hole in the side of the carton does not constitute opening the package.

[–] herrvogel@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

The cap also says "by using", so you have been outlawyered. You've been had. You have forfeited all your rights. You are now a property of Big Protein. Better luck next time.

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

By opening AND using.

A good lawyer would surely argue that they didn’t open and use it.

[–] ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Can claim negligence if that label is entirely removed prior to use, just say that it wasn’t there when you used it.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 51 points 18 hours ago

That's concerning.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 33 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

Interesting how we've all become accustomed to the notion that "agreeing to arbitration" has just become "waving your consumer rights" and no lawmaker is pushing to have that fixed.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 8 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

no lawmaker is pushing to have that fixed.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_Arbitration_Injustice_Repeal_Act

Was reintroduced several times, Passed the house once. Republicans keep killing it in committee.

There's also the Justice for workers Act specifically for work l employee force arbitration, more recently

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Because 98% of them are on the corporations' side because they practice insider trading.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 14 points 16 hours ago

Obvious solution is to not only return that one, but then go to a different brand of store, buy a bunch, then return them the next day. Repeat for each kind of store you can reach that sells them.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 27 points 18 hours ago

At the board meeting, I want to hear when they decided to broadcast that they're expecting to get sued, but in a really cute way

[–] nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 17 hours ago

Relevant lockpicking lawyer video

Tap for spoilerHis wife cuts it open from the bottom

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 18 hours ago

Now that it's opened slightly, return it "immediately"

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Shit like this is rarely enforceable but in order to find out, you need to have money.

What I like to do is clap back and send them my own terms and conditions, with the stipulation that if they don't write back, then they are accepting them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Addition@sh.itjust.works 19 points 17 hours ago

That's how you KNOW they're putting sawdust and filler in their products.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 21 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

all that jazz for a protein supplement?

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 5 points 14 hours ago

One full of toxic heavy metals.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Telling us the product so we could avoid it would be useful.

[–] half_fiction@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 15 hours ago

Other people are saying it's Vital Proteins, apparently.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blackbarn@lemmy.zip 12 points 18 hours ago

"I went to the url but it was just a 404, honest. No terms, no conditions"

[–] Iamsqueegee@sh.itjust.works 12 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Make your own opening elsewhere on the package.

[–] Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 hours ago

You're still opening it.

But if you have your friend open it, then you are not opening and consuming the product.

Of course, with such draconian rules, one should not drink that stuff anyway.

[–] ScatterBrain@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

This is what I imagine buying kratom is like

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Not really. They just hand you the powder in a pouch and say "that'll be $16.42, please".

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago

Open it. Return it. Repeat.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago

Some one should sue them for the maximum highest costs calculable for the travel time of having to return their products buying a new substitute brand, and going back home + legal fees.

Then that person should buy the product again to see if there's still an agreement in place, and sue them again.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago

return it after opening and consuming. the text does not say if you do not agree do not open. nor does it say you can’t agree, open, then disagree.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›