this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
665 points (98.5% liked)

memes

20165 readers
1711 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.org 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

"Bad things existed before, so we should not criticize them still existing today" is not a very strong argument.

[–] lmmarsano@group.lt 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Putting words into people's mouths is a weaker argument yet.

[–] arnitbier@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Uh huh which is why he simply illustrated the point being made and why its flawed lmao

He's responding to a meme criticizing this exact idea. So he'll likely criticising that criticism and defending its position.

This is like 5th grade level analysis bro it's not that complicated

But hey defend your guy. And the context is that you are defending that idea as well. Because why are you defending this and not every time someone reads into a comment? Likely because you have an issue with what he's pointing out. Not like automatically but it pretty likely DOES mean that and that matters to people, which is why we concern ourselves with implications of things we say in the modern age, it reveals shit