Not The Onion

18741 readers

1058 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

620

OpenAI says dead teen violated TOS when he used ChatGPT to plan suicide (arstechnica.com)

submitted 4 days ago by RobotToaster@mander.xyz to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

101 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

we need to design AIs accordingly

No, we don't. The harm was self-inflicted. The reader had unlimited time to contemplate their actions before committing them. This is entirely on the user.

[–] Live_your_lives@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Say I custom built a gun and gave it to someone I know who obviously has severe mental issues: do you think I would have no responsibility for the actions that other person takes? By your logic it seems like I shouldn't, since the mentally ill person has all the time in the world before they end up making a terrible decision.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

do you think I would have no responsibility for the actions that other person takes?

Yep: not your problem. That person needs a handler, and you're not theirs. We can give people informed choices. We have no duty to defend someone from their own irrationality.