‘But there is a difference between recognising AI use and proving its use. So I tried an experiment. … I received 122 paper submissions. Of those, the Trojan horse easily identified 33 AI-generated papers. I sent these stats to all the students and gave them the opportunity to admit to using AI before they were locked into failing the class. Another 14 outed themselves. In other words, nearly 39% of the submissions were at least partially written by AI.‘
Article archived: https://web.archive.org/web/20251125225915/https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/set-trap-to-catch-students-cheating-ai_uk_691f20d1e4b00ed8a94f4c01
I am currently at a university. Everything that is written is normally turned in through 'turn-it-in' that does all the checking. I get a percentage of quotes, plagiarism, and it scans references. They have also added in a preliminary AI scanner that tells 'possibility ' of ai writing.
I am glad I graduated a long ass time ago. The last time I took any major education was a coding bootcamp and it was just on rhe cusp of the first iterations of chatgpt and other such shit.
I never plagiarized, and i was never accused of plagiarism. I am glad that i did this before any of this AI nonsense.
One time i plagerized my name and page numbers according to turnitin
Lol. Sounds right. We see it as a percentage and it highlight what was plagiarized and the sources it is pulling it from, to include past university assignments. So yes, you can be hit for that - but then the human grader would see it as a false positive.