Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
I like the anonymity, though.
How are sites like lemmy or reddit or even social media less anonymous if you simply don't publish your personal information? Granted anonymity is not and has never been a guaranteed "thing" but I've seen this sentiment echoed a couple times in this post and it's confusing.
Is this in reference to how 4chan handled usernames or lack thereof?
Not OP, but I think forums were separate entities, so you could choose a different username on each one and have disconnected identities.
On Reddit, or even here, you have the same identity for all content you follow. People can easily trace out your profile.
You can still create for each topic a different account. One Lemmy account that is subscribed to game communites, another one for local news etc...
Yes, but who actually does that?
I honestly have two accounts, one for SFW content and another one on LemmyNSFW. But it's still a bit annoying to switch accounts.
I'm no longer convinced that universal privacy is necessarily a good thing when there are so many people deliberately working to sabotage nations, subvert social issues and create havoc and chaos for political purposes, as advance tactics for military invasions, and as ways to further the goals of corporations.
I think we should have privacy in our own spaces and an ability to not be hassled by others for being an individual with a real need to share information, but I cannot square that against the massive harm being done by people who are trying to make $10 a month creating arguments to make people hate each other in a country they will never have stake in.
I don't have a better alternative or solution, but I know that it's not so simple as anonymity is a universe good in the world. And it exists on a spectrum. I am far more concerned about a kid trying to get help understanding sexual health in private than some troglodyte on reddit who has 72 different accounts to argue with feminists to create the impression that he has a huge community behind him.
I think the big problem/reason why people feel the need for anonymity is because of what I mention here. Basically, people always feel on pins and needles with regards to shitty moderation.
I actually think further than this, people in power are almost always too blood lusty and immediately jump to permanent bans all the time.
It results in chilling effects that create echo chambers.
Of course what you talk about doesn't help as it serves to make people even more trigger happy as real bad faith threats exist and you can't easily tell intent.
I feel like to have real conversations online, maybe a more ideal hypothetical platform would have any sort of legal binding to follow certain terms, they'd require being connected to a real id without storing said personal information in plain text, and would connect that to specific IDs to completely shut down (meaningfully) the botting, to have people actually talk.
People could then chat as themselves, or anonymously under a username, but there would never be confusion as to whether or not someone was real.
This is very half baked though and I already can think of tons of problems.
People suck. People especially suck when they get even a modicum of power.