this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
739 points (94.0% liked)

linuxmemes

28113 readers
199 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • Don't come looking for advice, this is not the right community.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  • Β 

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 115 points 1 week ago (26 children)

    Guess we're all gonna ignore all the drama about LTT from last year?

    Saying he's the one who breaks is an understatement.

    [–] LaserTurboShark69@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago (15 children)
    [–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 59 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

    There were kinda three separate things that rolled together, mind you, I'm not especially in the know about any of them, so hopefully others can expand

    1. the auctioned something that was supposed to be a small company's prototype water block or something, it wasn't theirs to sell
    2. they started making too many errors in their rush to do large scale testing and when people make decisions based on the incorrect info you're putting out thats not great
    3. there was an employee who used to work at LTT after being a fan who they built a PC for (maddison, I think?). When the other two items above were brought up by gamer's nexus and it turned into a whole situation where people were being critical of LTT, she shared that she had an absolutely horrible experience working there, crazy crunch time, I think there was sexual harassment or something, I don't recall all the details. She explained she didn't share it sooner because she expected people would just turn on her for criticizing LTT and it makes sense she would feel more able to share if people seem like they might be more receptive to criticism of a huge channel like that

    The first two that were brought up in an bombshell gamer's nexus video were, imo, handled very poorly (EDIT: I should clarify, I meant the initial first reseponse), though again, I don't remember details (about the very first response I think I remember not being great, or otherwise πŸ˜…)

    The last item I'm honestly not sure how it panned out but my impression is that nothing really happened with it. LTT was gonna transfer CEO to being a new guy with Linus being more of a face and direction guy, and the new CEO guy I think was the one who had an outside investigation of some kind conducted. I don't think there was ever an update about that investigation? I dunno. I didn't watch much before the whole situation and just kinda stopped watching when the initial criticism from gamer's nexus was poorly handled

    [–] fonix232@fedia.io 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    IIRC for the third item, the ex-employee who threw those accusations around turned out to be exaggerating things - but there was a whole ass investigation and Linus did step down as CEO, handing the reins over to a new guy who was literally brought in to fix these things (although to be fair I had the feeling that Linus has been wanting to step back for a while and this gave him an out).

    Mind you I'm not saying that there weren't problems (any company that scales as much as LMG did in the past few years will have issues), but that the issues presented to the public by the disgruntled employee were heavily exaggerated.

    [–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    I think maybe we should stop short of saying we know for a fact what did or didn't happen with her. An outside investigation does absolutely help, and hopefully if anything was wrong it has now been rectified.

    But there are lots of ways that companies can clear their names, and bringing in a company to do an investigation could either be done in good faith, or be a very effective way of cleaning up an enormous PR mess.

    I think we should be warry of making snap calls about who was factually in the right in these kinds of situations unless there's hard evidence available to us. Often these situations are about our gut feeling of what happened, and our gut feeling isn't objective. And getting it wrong in either direction has the potential to be enormously damaging (though in this case I believe there was no specific alleged perpetrator for the allegations like sexual harassment)

    I feel this is one of those situations where nuance and being okay with not knowing exactly what happened is important. Though perhaps you know more facts about the situation than I do, and have more concrete reason to believe it was highly exaggerated

    [–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

    Thank you, it's refreshing to see someone adopt a sober mind about the situation. It's been a minefield of sweeping conclusions from incomplete information.

    I understand that parasocial relationships make it difficult to be objective but frankly establishing facts in an employment dispute ex post facto is a dubious endeavor.

    [–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

    I'm glad its appreciated ☺️

    Love your username! Hope you have a lovely day my friend

    [–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

    Wasn't the Linus being replaced as CEO thing planned several years ago? I remember there being a video

    load more comments (7 replies)
    load more comments (11 replies)
    load more comments (21 replies)