this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2025
3 points (66.7% liked)
Hasan Piker
246 readers
3 users here now
Lemmy's home for Hasan chatters to meme and share!
- Properly Credit O.C. If You Didn't Make It
- Flag NSFW (Within Reason)
- No-Bigotry
- Respect Others (Lemmy.world Instance Rules Apply)
| Hasan's Links | ||
|---|---|---|
| Twitch | YouTube | |
| Vlog YouTube | Gaming YouTube | |
| Fear& YouTube | Fear& Patreon | Fear& Twitter |
| Fear& Spotify | Streamlabs Tips | ------------ |
Former /r/Hasan_Piker mods can join the Lemmy mod list by sending a link to their Lemmy profile to my new Reddit account /u/_Emi_Rose and making a post within the Lemmy community. Once I verify their presence on the Subreddit's mod list, they will be promoted here as well.💟
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I don't have one innocent explanation nor can I come up with all possible explanations. The explanations I gave so far were just illustrations of potential explanations, some of them innocent, some not.
The point I'm trying to make is speculation about why someone did something isn't proof of guilt. Evidence is proof, and until there is evidence everything else is just interpretation.
Okay, good to know you can't come up with even one potential innocent explanation. You have offered two which are clearly garbage, and then retreated into this landscape where anything's possible and nothing matters, just because in a vague sense lots of explanations might be possible.
Probably a good decision tactically. You may have a feeling that if you attempt to offer another innocent explanation it may be shown to contradict some kind of other clear evidence, and you may be right.
(Also, again, it's relevant that Hasan is already on camera abusing other dogs, and that his attempt at an innocent explanation is one of those explanations that can't possibly be true. It is legitimately confusing to me why those things are not important to you. Parasocial relationships are a hell of a drug, I guess.)
Anyway I am done now. I was just curious if you had anything better to offer.
It's not tactical, it's just how guilt is generally determined. Speculative testimony (like "I think he did it for this reason") is generally inadmissible in court. Speculation about motives isn't evidence. Offering my own speculation about motives wouldn't count as proof either, so it doesn't make sense for me to do that.
Absolutely correct. If I see anyone doing that, I'll be sure to yell at them for you.