this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2025
1477 points (97.8% liked)

Science Memes

17465 readers
3033 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I think the flip side of this is Facebook or wherever the link was pushed to your in-laws (which is what I'd guess happened) feels... empowering. Those apps are literally optimized, with billions of dollars (and extensive science, especially psychology), to validate folk's views in the pursuit of keeping them clicking. Their world's telling them they're right; of course your retort will feel offensive and wrong.

They're in a trap.

And I still see lot of scientists posit 'why is this happening?' unironically on Twitter or something, which really frustrates me.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Every Facebook profile posted to /r/HermanCainAwards (the subreddit for mocking deluded people who died of COVID while spreading misinformation) was the same. Whatever the formula was it worked great at sucking in a specific sort of person

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What’s incredible is Facebook is not liable for that at all.

What if… I dunno, a giant school peddled that same info? Or some religious figure got a ton of people killed? There’s really not a good metaphor for Facebook, which is why folks don’t really know of the sheer influence they command, yet are still treated like a garage startup operating a fair forum that needs legal protection.

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Absolutely agree. The "internet" was not a harmful worldview reinforcing machine back when we were told not to cite GeoCities in our book reports.

Asking people to betray their dopamine is a monumental task. It's like like challenging any other addiction.

[–] Taalnazi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Best way to change that is to shut down algorithms that have that bias, and mandate media literacy.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That doesn’t work because people like the algorithms, unfortunately. They win the attention war, and Trump is perfectly emblematic of this.

It’s also not even about ‘political bias’. Toxicity is the natural end state.

[–] Taalnazi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Some countries do take action. Mine does, by banning that.