this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2025
414 points (99.1% liked)

politics

26519 readers
2062 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 48 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

An actual honest to God mistake. I'm surprised.
I was fully expecting this to be malicious on the part of the current administration.

Tldr: She requested her records a few years ago, and those were the same files released recently by mistake. Clerk messed up, thats all.

[–] primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 45 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not willing to give any benefit of doubt right now.

Edit: remember: doge is still in all these systems.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social -5 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 months ago

what exactly in the article do you think proves it was an honest mistake and not a deliberate act?

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 4 points 2 months ago

Yeah, it helps understand how it happened. They submitted the request and there was a typo, then they called

And I'm sure the call started with an introduction that tipped off the fact that he was helping with a Republican political campaign, and the "very helpful" clerk gave out privileged information gleefully.

This is the environment created by Trump and doge. This is why they do the loyalty tests and fire people illegally through emails.

This is what it looks like when you politically weaponise the state

Bullshit it was an accident - it was one person breaking procedure after months of the president calling for exactly this

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

People in those departments deal with classified info where they can't make those types of 'mistakes'.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 12 points 2 months ago

That or weaponized incompetence.