this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2025
47 points (98.0% liked)

World News

50991 readers
1808 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Wednesday that the upcoming federal budget would focus on both austerity and investments, adding that current government spending was unsustainable.

Canada has been dealing with economic uncertainty since the start of the year, so the primary focus of the budget will be to cut operational spending and trigger investments into major projects, Carney told reporters in Toronto.

"It's a budget of austerity and investment at the same time and that's possible if you have discipline," he said

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Losing $5 and losing $100 are both bad but I know which one I'd pick. They are not equal and insisting they are is what led us here today.

The better solution is not to lose any money at all, and in the long term that's the goal. But in the mean time I'll pick $5 every time.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't matter if it's $100 and $99, or $100 and $0.01, my point is there are more than those two options. There are in fact a nearly infinite variety of options. You just have to decide that you want a third option. Stop picking between two bad options if you don't want bad options.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Realistically those are the only two options. Voting for Bernie Sanders or the NDP would not have changed a single thing and wishing won't make it so. And if enough people don't vote for the lesser evil you risk the worse one winning. That's how the world ended up with Trump.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

Think longer term. How did the stage get set for this outcome? How could someone like Trump get elected in a healthy and properly functioning democracy? This is a consequence that was decades in the making, at least. Maybe being "realistic" about what we think we can achieve is what got us into this mess. Maybe we need to start questioning this "reality", because it doesn't seem to be working out very well for us. Maybe wishing for something better is our only hope. Or maybe it's the first step to something actually better.