this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2025
2 points (100.0% liked)

Right to be Offline / Analog / Unplugged

99 readers
1 users here now

The developed world is increasingly forcing people to use incompetently designed technology. The #digitalTransformation movement is being forced onto people.

Just like we cannot rely on the public sector to solve the climate crisis, we also cannot rely on the public sector to deploy well-designed privacy-respecting inclusive technology. We always need an analog option.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As some might recall, I am offline by choice. I still have to make periodic trips to public hotspots to send and fetch msgs, and to write this post herein for example.

I can theoretically improve on that using a Wi-Fi AP. I could run a webserver without Internet, which is only accessible to those in Wi-Fi range of my residence. They could connect via Wi-Fi and a captive portal kind of mechanism could force the traffic to a website that I run. The website could have a msg like:

“Please tell Alice@wherever that I like her idea and want to meet”

or something like:

“Please post to freecycle that I have an air fryer to give away if someone wants it”

Of course, that’s just a half-baked brainstorm to give an idea. That would not be a manual labor intensive procedure and a non-starter. But in principle I should be able to broadcast an encrypted personal msg to Alice and someone more connected should be able to run an app on their phone that automatically grabs their neighbor’s msgs and sends them.

I think there even already exists an Android app that exchanges msgs with other devices over wifi or bluetooth, which works without Internet. I forgot the name of it but I had the impression it was a system of its own that does not use other protocols like email or activitypub.

UPDATE: I need to look into some of these apps:

https://www.geckoandfly.com/22562/chat-without-internet-connection-mesh-network/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dermanus@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That sounds like being online with extra steps.

[–] evenwicht@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Then with that kind of rationale, you might as well say I am already “online”, based on the fact that I occasionally connect from libraries and various public spaces, given the extra step of putting my device into a backpack to cycle to the connection point.

Not sure what point you are struggling to make here after apparently neglecting to follow the link, but I have managed to avoid directly financing monopolistic telecoms that would impose forced-banking as a precondition to joining their pricey surveillance-prone network, in addition to the huge digital footprint imposed by banking in itself.