this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
197 points (99.5% liked)

Boycott US

2481 readers
401 users here now

Overview:

The community dedicated to boycotting the US until they stop fascism, restore full democracy and start following international law.

Americans have a moral obligation to resist Donald Trump and project 2025 at every turn.

America is a flawed democracy currently being ruled by oligarchs. Stop the backslide! Dont let America become the next Hungary.

America needs to challenge the court rulings of citizens united v. fec and shelby county v. holder, protect the media, implement independent district drawing, and the single transferable vote so they don't end up having people stay home in life-changing elections because they cannot vote for their favourite candidate.

Join 50501.chat to fight back!


Related communities:

Boycott:!buycanadian@lemmy.ca

!buyeuropean@feddit.uk

!boycott@lemmy.sdf.org

!boycottchina@sopuli.xyz

Activism:!antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world

!petitions@lemmy.ca

!palestine@lemmy.dbzer0.com

!protest@lemmy.world

!israelicrimes@lemmy.world

!patriotsforprogress@lemmy.ca

!goodsuniteus@lemmy.ca


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

On Tuesday, May 19, the U.S. House passed H.R. 2616, the "Stopping Indoctrination and Protecting Kids Act," by a vote of 217-198. The bill would hand the Trump administration enormous leverage to strip federal funding from any school that “teaches or advances concepts” related to transgender people, codifying into federal law the anti-trans definitions from Trump's executive order 14168, "Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism." It would also require public schools to forcibly out transgender students to their parents before using their pronouns or chosen names. The bill is significant on its own terms for the harm it would inflict on transgender youth if it became law. But what made Tuesday's vote especially notable was the eight Democrats who joined every Republican to pass it—the largest Democratic defection on any standalone anti-trans bill of this Congress.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 40 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Right wing party members vote for right wing bill.

Is there anybody surprised by this? The Democrats are only "the left" by American standards. The rest of the world has them centre-leaning right wing.

[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Bingo. There is no left party in the US, despite what MAGA has been brainwashed to believe. And, a giant issue in the US is having two parties only.

And no, it's not that both parties are the same across the board. That's a libertarian cop-out. There are clear policy differences.

However, one issue which unites both parties is money. Both parties are bought and sold by corporations, and that needs to be handled. Crucially: there is no system in place to allow voters to correct this.

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

There are two parties of billionaires with only a very small number of non-shared members, yes. Which is why the billionaires don't really care who's in power. They care only to push the drama that distracts the public from the reality of the country. That helps ward off the guillotines.

[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 1 points 5 hours ago

Yeah, agree. It feels like more than an issue with two-party voting itself in some/many ways.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 7 points 19 hours ago

The Dems used to be to the right of Canada's Conservative party.

That's not because they moved to the left unfortunately.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I guess we just need to vote D harder. 🤣😭

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

There's something called a primary.

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Which they famously always have

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 9 hours ago

Yes and right now there's a lot of momentum favoring progressives, so be sure to vote in the primaries, and if your district isn't running any progressives, consider running yourself

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 6 points 23 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 8 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

No. I've said the same thing for half a decade. Any candidate unwilling to form and carry out policy positions that move the party from right to left that actually benefits the working class at home and in the countries we bully aren't getting my vote.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 14 hours ago

I said what I said.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

And how does you not voting for a Harris hurt Donnie?

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

No. Voting for these types helps the far right and corrupt businesses. You put yourself in that mental prison all you want. I'm not and I'm not stupid enough to imagine it any more.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 7 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah, you might want to look up Frederick Douglas.

Ex-slave, Douglas was a big advocate for abolition.

In 1860 Douglas had a choice between supporting a candidate who was for immediate abolition, or supporting Abe Lincoln. Lincoln wasn't advocating instant abolition.

Douglas decided that it was smarter to support Lincoln. Lincoln has a much better chance of winning, and Douglas would be able to advocate his stance to the actual President, instead of being locked out.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 19 hours ago

That's a bad example because Lincoln was an abolitionist himself but you're applying it to politicians that don't agree with your stance.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 6 points 21 hours ago

166 years ago, the corruption was easier to spot and check, and people with the right and will to keep and bear arms and the will and ability to use them to "water the tree of liberty" weren't just the ignorant hicks, even if they did buy into the lie that sold the revo.

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Hack job argument, it was clear to many at the time Lincoln didn't like slavery, it's why the south was so wound up about it near him. Douglas knew this already and tried pushing Lincoln to go for it, completely different situation. If you hate both side of leadership, leave the country For greener grasses.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Lincoln didn't gaf and said as much. His goal was only to prevent civil war.

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 4 points 14 hours ago

“My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the union without freeing any slaves I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that.”

https://www.reuters.com/article/fact-check/abraham-lincoln-quote-about-slavery-is-missing-context-idUSL1N2OQ1LE/

That's how much he cared.

[–] LostCarcosan@lemmy.today 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You're right that you aren't that stupid. You're stupider

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 21 hours ago

Dunning and Kruger

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 0 points 17 hours ago

Leaving that shithole.

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world -3 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Yes. If you do the math, you'll see that it wouldn't have mattered if they had voted against this. So they buy political capital with the centrists by doing this. Politics is complicated. But if we give them the power to actually move things left, then they can do that.

[–] vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works 8 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

"Centrists" do not exist amongst the American populace.

You are either courting the far-right, approximately 20% of the US population, or you are courting the entire rest of the US population, all of whom are further left than the Democratic party.

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 1 points 6 hours ago

Ah... They may be "farther left" than the Democratic Party, but by world standards the average American is a right-centrist.

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I'd like to believe that too, but it's clearly not true. About 1/2 American voters voted for trump. That's not being left of Dems. At all.

[–] vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Not everyone that voted for Trump is right-wing. We can argue about effect of vote versus ideological reason for vote for decades, and people have, but the short answer is MAGA isn't the only group that voted for Trump.

It also wasn't half of American voters. It was half of people that cast a vote. 77 million adults voted for Trump. As of November 2024 there were around 280 million adults in the US. That's 27.5% that caused Trump to be elected, or 72.5% of people that did not vote for Trump, not including the ~60 million children that also have to suffer and largely have been against Trump as they've started aging into the adult population.

Given historically Republicans represent no more than 25% of the vote (and do note most republicans aren't actually right-wing, they're idiots) we can assume the extra are protest votes, misguided people, idiots, accelerationists, or even just people that genuinely still believe Trump is antiestablishment for whatever reason.

Do note that most polls suggest 70-90% of the population agree with socialist and communist policies, as long as you do not use those terms; from universal health care, to unionization, to abolition of the billionaire class, these are incredibly popular ideas.

The 6 trillion or so dollars spent by the US to brainwash Americans against the words socialist and communist since 1914 has caused a mess of people voting against their own personal ideology.

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 1 points 6 hours ago

(and do note most republicans aren’t actually right-wing, they’re idiots)

I don't understand. Most Republicans aren't actually idiots, they're idiots. I don't get it.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Like they codified RvW, bettered education, strengthened education, stopped secret FISA courts and data collection, bombing people overseas, implemented universal health and higher education, emptied prisons, stopped killing and locking up poors for bogus reasons, prosecuted and jailed superwealthy for poisoning the environment and killing workers. Sterengthend union rights rather than crushing a budding rail strike just before a few trainwrecks that further damaged the environment and people's health? Jailed Trump? 🧐

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

They never had the power to do all of that. Yes, they are beholden to the billionaires. But they are not as bad as trump. And they can be pushed more progressive.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Like they have since FDR, amirite? 🤮

[–] optimisticturtle@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

LBJ, problematic antics aside (and not excusing his foreign policy either) was a continuation of FDR domestically. An expansion even. Because while FDR abandoned minorities to keep support for his New Deal, LBJ made sure minorities also benefited from the Great Society at great political expense. Modern Dems though are just Reagan lite.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 7 hours ago

Modern Dems are right of Reagan.